On Sunday 14 December 2003 12:41 pm, Magnus von Koeller wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2003 17:21, Al Davis wrote: > > It is worth putting up with some spam to get a free, > > uncensored, fast email system. > > Free, uncensored and worthless would be a better description > for my email account if it wasn't for my Spam filtering - > considering that > > >95% of my email is Spam.
YOUR spam filtering. Actually ... I have several email addresses, and my mail comes in from several paths. MY spam filtering seems to be nearly 100% effective on the freeelectron address, which I control. It seems to be nearly 0% effective on the ieee address, which someone else controls. A couple of years ago, I tried configuring my home system to apply that rule about tagging dynamic ip that doesn't go through a relay. It was 0% effective. 100% of what it tagged was non-spam. 100% of the spam passed. It was effective at tagging viruses, but on Linux they were not a problem. It is easier and more effective to reject microsoft executables. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
