On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 07:56:46PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Wed 09 Oct 2019 at 21:30:52 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:57:58PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > > On Wed 09 Oct 2019 at 20:20:43 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > > > > Unsure if it still on the first installation DVD, but let's take good > > > > > > You could easily check. > > > > And thus, ladies and gentlemen, we have a volunteer. > > Please check it, and share results with the list. > > https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/list-dvd/debian-10.1.0-i386-DVD-1.list.gz > > Game. set and match.
Thanks, consider doing it all from the start next time. > > > > old rkhunter. Using it for its primary purpose (i.e. searching for > > > > rootkits) is overly optimistic these days. But it's secondary purpose is > > > > > > "these days"? "overly optimistic"? rkhunter has never found a rootkit > > > > Try reading whole sentences next time. > > I'm aware that rkhunter and you share a troubled past. There's no need > > to remind about it every time someone mentions rkhunter in this list. > > The primary purpose of rkhunter (whether it is realises or not) is to > produce false positves and confuse any naive user who installs it. Fill a wishlist bug report to change rkhunter description to reflect your stance. Don't waste that negative energy in maillists, use it for a common good. > A respected member of this list who advocates using it presumably has an > excellent technical reason for doing so. In may be shocking, I know. The reason was in the statement you choose not to quote. Starting with "But it's secondary purpose is". Reco
