Incoming from Roberto Sanchez: > s. keeling wrote: > >Incoming from Richard Kimber: > >>Obligation? What about a sense of pride in having done something well? > > > >He did do it well! It works! Oh, "well" for you means fully > >documented so Aunt Tilley can use it? I disagree. If you disagree > >with me, you're free to change that. LDP. > > Please go read a text book on Software Engineering. If you read the > sections on the software lifecycle, you will see that every phase is > punctuated by a form of documentation that is particalar to that phase. > Do you get that? Every phase of the project _should_ be well
And if I don't, you're free to choose to not use it. I am not a doctor, lawyer, nor barber. The State does not tell me what I have to do to write software. btw, I do document my software and have received terriffic complements for this. I'm simply saying that I have no right to demand your standard of documentation from someone who has just built a program that I'm getting a chance to use for free. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
