On Mi, 31 iul 19, 04:43:31, Bonno Bloksma wrote: > > >> You have several encryption algorithms, but: > >> a) They are not equally good. > > Of course not - they never are ;) The trick is to pick a good one, and for > > wifi, that's WPA2 using AES. > > Indeed, if one uses AES instead of PSK then it gets lots safer but now > we ARE getting in to harder to use protocol. Not all WiFi hardware > knows how to use WPA2 AES encryption.
PSK = Pre-shared key AES = Advanced Encryption Standard Encryption It's not "AES instead of PSK", but "WPA2-PSK, with AES encryption". > >> b) You may have a hardware that lack support for a good ones. > > I suppose, but my impression is that most hardware from the last few years > > is fine. > > All devices should know WPA2 and PSK, maybe not AES. WPA2-PSK with AES has been my wireless configuration for several years. The only complaints I've had were about the length of the password ;) Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
