-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:43:24PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > I may be a small minority, but I view the web page at... > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html as being harmfull.
Why? You see exactly what Reply-To is supposed to be used for, and the problems it creates when people set it themselves and post to a list. Most mailing lists no longer set reply-to from what I've seen. This behaviour is also standardized in the RFCs and has been for a long time now. Get with the third millennium. > Email users are divided into two classes; > 1) Those who have effective spam-blocking > 2) Those who wish they did 3) Those who wish everybody just reported spam. spamcop.net is your friend. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/19zmUzgNqloQMwcRAna+AJ9+VcYB3uKa3FITNGzgcYyv5zmQ0wCffmGK Uh/gxbh1baLgdVeRxXcqkQ0= =2Os2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
