On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:54:26 +0300 Reco <recovery...@enotuniq.net> wrote:
> Hi. > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:42:53AM +0200, arne wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:26:13 +0300 > > Reco <recovery...@enotuniq.net> wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:17:31AM +0000, Long Wind wrote: > > > > Thank Reco! > > > > > > You're welcome. > > > > > > > > > > intel get higher mark than amd > > > > > > That's expected. You need raw CPU power - you buy Intel. > > > > > > > You need power buy AMD threadripper: 64 threads > > If I ever need many threads, I'll buy Xeon. You can compare: https://img.purch.com/r/711x457/aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9ILzAvNzkxMTcyL29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDA0LnBuZw== > If I ever need enormous amount of threads, I'll buy UltraSPARC. > If I ever need good single CPU - there's IBM's Power for that. > If I need low TDP - there are ARM and MIPS. > > AMD just does not fit anywhere. > > Reco >
