On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 04:58:58AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 17 October 2018 04:11:00 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...] > > Now there are counter-arguments to all of that, and on my balance > > they dominate (that's why I stick with sysvinit), but saying that > > "no one from the systemd camp has ... posted a list of things ..." > > is highly unfair. Look again. > > Where? > > > You ask where? My go-to site for fundamental knowledge is lwn.net. > > A (hpoefully *not* Google) network search "systemd site:lwn.net" > > yields, among other things, those gems: > > Not an lwn subscriber. I mean publically available sites. lwn is not. C'mon, Gene. You can do better. Just /look/ at things before stating alternative facts. LWN /is/ a subscription-financed site. But its content is generally available, has always been. Non-subscribers just "pay" a week's delay for editorial content. After that, it's accessible to all, no strings attached. > > Systemd programming part 1: modularity and configuration > > https://lwn.net/Articles/584175/ > > > By golly, the embargo has expired, so the public can access them. I WILL > read them when I have working eyes again. The "embargo" is, and has been for a long time, just one week. For a subscriber-sponsored publication (which is very important, because this means independency from the Big Ones!), this is outstanding, IMHO. > We'll see, after I have absorbed what lwn has to offer. I've never been > bashfull about that when I find I'm wrong. :-) > > (And all of this from a systemd opponent. Sheesh.) > > That figures, Tomas, many thanks. I never dreamt I was going to do this ;-D Cheers -- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
