Hi, mick crane lured me into writing: > > No loopback is needed.
David wrote: > It is a "loop" device. Indeed. Probably i would also have adopted "loo-thingy" while my head was wrapped around the partition table stuff. Have a nice day :) Thomas
Hi, mick crane lured me into writing: > > No loopback is needed.
David wrote: > It is a "loop" device. Indeed. Probably i would also have adopted "loo-thingy" while my head was wrapped around the partition table stuff. Have a nice day :) Thomas