Hi, Reco wrote: > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original.
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. I could offer my program cdrskin as real example. It is a cdrecord/wodim compatibility wrapper but exceeds both when it comes to DVD and BD media. > Suppose some piece of software is running (or trying to run) on a piece of > hardware where some function does not work because the software was written > to > depend on a certain set of (let's say machine) instructions which don't exist > on that particular machine. Or suppose a program which insists to treat every optical medium like a CD, regardless what the specs say ... Have a nice day :) Thomas
