Hi, i wrote: > That's probably because there is bash-ism in the script,
Of course i meant to say: That's probably because there is _no_ bash-ism in the script, Have a nice day :) Thomas
Hi, i wrote: > That's probably because there is bash-ism in the script,
Of course i meant to say: That's probably because there is _no_ bash-ism in the script, Have a nice day :) Thomas