On 25/08/2018 05:45, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Friday, 24 Aug 2018 at 20:15, Reco wrote:
-INT_MAX. I win.
-1 (wraps around so = INT_MAX) and I win!
No, it is the other way around for two's complement:
INT_MIN = -INT_MAX - 1
Two's complement is unbalanced. You do not know the power of the dark
(negative) side.
For example, for signed 32-bit integers using two's complement (C/C++
int on most current architectures and JVM int).
INT_MAX = 2**31 - 1 = 2147483647
INT_MIN = -2**31 = -2147483648
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer_(computer_science)
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand
