On 8/19/2018 8:59 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 08/19/2018 02:28 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 02:04:39PM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Note that second field is a mountpoint in fstab(5), as one of the stock
records show:
UUID=8f4eeaae-a055-4262-bebb-cf99abe982a5 /var ext4 defaults
0 2
Yours have a block device name instead of mountpoint:
UUID=900b5f0b-4f3d-4a64-8c91-29aee4c6fd07 /dev/sdb1 ext4
errors=remount-ro 0
1
UUID=d65867da-c658-4e35-928c-9dd2d6dd5742 /dev/sdc1 ext4
errors=remount-ro 0
1
UUID=007c1f16-34a4-438c-9d15-e3df601649ba /dev/sdc2 ext4
errors=remount-ro 0
1
So even a stock mount(1) should refuse to mount these.
When I rebooted the computer the OS didn't like the new fstab and
gave me a
number of, at least to me, obscure messages.
systemd-mount can be cryptic, I agree.
Obviously, I missed something important. My question is what?
It's a kind of dumb question, but where do you need your sdb1, sdc1 and
sdc2 mounted? Your fstab(5) does not mention that.
Reco
Well, that's another red faced forehead slapper!
It merely reinforces that I don't know what I'm doing as far as hardware
is concerned.
It's a good thing that I'm an Organic Chemist and not an IT person.
Instead of trying your new changes in '/etc/fstab' by rebooting, you
could also try 'mount -a'.
https://linux.die.net/man/8/mount
--
John Doe
