i can neither find the source on salsa (since as far as what i've found lsb-base is a stripped down version compared to the actual lsb specs?), nor a man entry. It has something to do with logging?
I guess thats not very essential, although a breakage could be very annoying for locating other problems. On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 21:51 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Octopus Octopus wrote: > > as <o...@debian.org> states > > > > For all practical concerns, you should consider the LSB > > package orphaned (and > > I should probably just go ahead and orphan it). > > > > > > and if a lot of things depend on lsb-base, isn't that like, very > > very bad? > > Like 'a critical component of our system has been left > > completely > > unmaintained' bad? > > Have you looked at lsb-base? >
