On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 05:51:07AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > Call off the dogs, you and several other are correct, and I should not be > posting bad info at 3 or 4 am when the only reason I'm up at all is to > take the recyclables to the curb. Its just that I've been running the 32 > bit versions so well for more than half a decade I was convinced that > was the way to fly.
I wasn't aiming no set the dogs on anybody, merely looking to clarify that amd64 packages aren't only for AMD processors or 32-bit packages only for 32-bit processors. Indeed, I still run 32-bit on a couple of 64-bit capable systems due to the factors that they were originally built on 32-bit hardware and their configuration and workload really wouldn't benefit in any real terms from 64-bit, so the work involved in the transfer wouldn't be well spent. Cheers, Tom -- 1: No code table for op: ++post
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
