I learnt about dnsmasq when I used Tor to see wiki, thanks for this 
hint. For now it works but I am not sure your help about auth-soa is all I need 
to get
notifying to the other name server. I just added this line: 
                        
"auth-soa=2018022800,root.ns.rodary.net,10800,3600,10800" 
in /etc/dnsmasq.conf, and after restarting dnsmasq (systemctl restart 
dnsmaq.service) I get this result with "systemctl status dnsmaq.service: " 
dnsmasq.service - dnsmasq
- A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server
................................
     
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: ignore le serveur de nom 88.170.1.143 - 
interface locale
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: utilise le serveur de nom 217.70.177.40#53
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: utilise le serveur de nom 212.27.40.240#53
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: utilise le serveur de nom 212.27.40.241#53
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: aucun serveur trouvé dans 
/run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf, va réessayer
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: Lecture de /run/dnsmasq/resolv.conf
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: ignore le serveur de nom 88.170.1.143 - 
interface locale
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: utilise le serveur de nom 217.70.177.40#53
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: utilise le serveur de nom 212.27.40.240#53
févr. 28 23:52:33 ns dnsmasq[24452]: utilise le serveur de nom 212.27.40.241#53"
        
First 88.170.1.14 is my main IP to the outside, is it local?  Second, before I 
added the refresh,retry, expire fields, supposed to have defaults values (said 
man 8
dnsmasq), I had another line in the output: 
        "févr. 28 23:20:17 ns dnsmasq[24453]: Too few arguments."
Does this mean dnsmasq will notify the other name server (ns6.gandi.net,  
217.70.177.40#53) when needed? For now this server answers query about hosts I 
didn't put in
/etc/hosts? 
        Anyway it works for the time present, and many thanks again.
                Jacques
                P.S.: Cookies are not my favorites, but I know some recipes you 
would like, I am sure!

Reply via email to