On 12/18/17, Roger Price <deb...@rogerprice.org> wrote: > Hi, command "inxi -S" reports > Host: maria Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 (64 bit) Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3 > > The user has defined $HOME/.config/autostart/xclock.desktop as > > [Desktop Entry] > Name=Clock > Comment=Clock with seconds hand > Icon=xclock > Exec=xclock -update 1 -geometry 200x200+150+400 > Terminal=false > Type=Application > > When the user logs in, he gets multiple instances of xclock. > > root@maria ~ → ps -elf | grep -E "xclock|xfce4-session" > 0 S rprice 1828 1757 0 80 0 - 84510 SyS_po 11:59 tty2 > 00:00:00 xfce4-session > 0 S rprice 1861 1828 0 80 0 - 17225 SyS_po 11:59 tty2 > 00:00:00 xclock -xtsessionID > 2c551690d-8efb-4da6-b355-e5df701247f2 > -update 1 -geometry 200x200+150+400 > 0 S rprice 1869 1828 0 80 0 - 17225 SyS_po 11:59 tty2 > 00:00:00 xclock -xtsessionID > 2a3e8f976-91d6-4127-bcd2-53cf55e7036f > -update 1 -geometry 200x200+150+400 > 0 S rprice 1870 1828 0 80 0 - 17225 SyS_po 11:59 tty2 > 00:00:00 xclock -xtsessionID > 26ca134b7-27ad-4be3-adb9-24153b08bd35 > -update 1 -geometry 200x200+150+400 > 0 S rprice 1888 1828 0 80 0 - 17225 SyS_po 11:59 tty2 > 00:00:00 xclock -xtsessionID > 238b91a2f-08bd-4734-9417-d283122ab160 > -update 1 -geometry 200x200+150+400 > 0 S rprice 1975 1828 0 80 0 - 17225 SyS_po 11:59 tty2 > 00:00:00 xclock -update 1 -geometry > 200x200+150+400 > > Why is this? Is there some way of avoiding these extra xclock's? > The user's xosview.desktop produces only one copy of xosview, and > xload.desktop produces only one xload.
Hi.. I don't have any answer but lurked along since I just debootstrap'ed in another Stretch/XFCE4 combo the other day. I just now installed inxi and received this: 0 S candyca+ 722 677 0 80 0 - 82264 SyS_po Dec14 ? 00:00:00 xfce4-session It also incidentally echoed back the grep command. Hadn't heard of xosview before, either. As such, I have no idea of its significance in this case, but installed it, too. I love it. It's like going back to the innocence of the 90's. :) Ran the grep again after installing xosview, and feedback remained the same. One different factor is that mine's been running for a couple days. If I remember to, I'll run that again at an upcoming intended reboot to see if things change. My guess would be that it wouldn't. You know, as I write that last part, something came back to memory. My Debian, forgot what combo now, went through a period of Thunar surviving and thus staying somehow live/active through reboots. The window wouldn't pop up, but Thunar was grep'able in my "ps aux" queries I was running at that time. It was purely by accident that I discovered Thunar was somehow surviving reboots. I was having problems with something unrelated, and there sat Thunar like it was open when it hadn't yet been used after a fresh reboot. A Developer apparently caught it or accidentally fixed it while addressing some other issue or feature because I haven't seen that occur in a while now... Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * runs with duct tape *