You should not use "uswsusp" anymore on recent OS releases. Hibernate
should work "out-of-the-box" assuming swap partition is big enough.
Remove "uswsusp", double check "/etc/fstab" swap entry
$ sudo blkid | grep swap
/dev/sdb2: LABEL="swap" UUID="d0331ef1-bc12-473f-bd4a-b4edf0d4d0a8"
TYPE="swap" PARTUUID="88839920-fc62-4f3a-aa7c-e97cd1ed4d5d"
$ cat /etc/fstab | grep swap
UUID=d0331ef1-bc12-473f-bd4a-b4edf0d4d0a8 none swap sw
0 0
and "/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume"
$ cat /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume
RESUME=UUID=d0331ef1-bc12-473f-bd4a-b4edf0d4d0a8
Check swap is working via "swapon"
After that either reinstall initramfs-tools via
$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall initramfs-tools
or update initramfs via
$ sudo update-initramfs -u -v | grep "Adding config"
This way you can see all config files and check them if swap
partition\hibernation image is still not found.
Reboot and try to hibernate.
On 10.09.2017 16:13, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
>
>> Pierre's bug, he shared that extra bit about how it's checking for a
>> wrong UUID. It's possible I'm not cognitively grasping that the same
>> is mentioned in Bug #861057, but right now I'm not seeing that
>> referenced there. Maybe that was what was going on under the hood on
>> that closed bug, too..........
>
> I recently increased my swap partition size, and the wrong UUID
> was that of the old swap, and was set in the resume option of grub.cfg.
> After updating grub, this problem disappears, but anyway, the
> hibernate stuff in Debian
> seems really crazy:
> I found 3 different places where the resume can be defined
> /etc/uswsusp.conf
> /boot/grub.cfg
> /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume
> I tried all 3 together, with the following result
>
> Sep 10 12:20:08 pfr3 kernel: [ 1.186027] PM: Checking hibernation
> image partition /dev/disk/by-uuid/42b1dc3e-6206-4bd5-9eb4-76e97f94cd65
> Sep 10 12:20:08 pfr3 kernel: [ 1.201123] PM: Hibernation image not
> present or could not be loaded.
> Sep 10 12:20:08 pfr3 kernel: [ 2.728912] PM: Hibernation image
> partition 8:4 present
> Sep 10 12:20:08 pfr3 kernel: [ 2.728914] PM: Looking for
> hibernation image.
> Sep 10 12:20:08 pfr3 kernel: [ 2.729062] PM: Image not found (code
> -22)
> Sep 10 12:20:08 pfr3 kernel: [ 2.729064] PM: Hibernation image not
> present or could not be loaded.
>
> who can explain that?
> It seems that the image was not written on disk when issuing the
> hibernate-disk command, but why ?
>
> best regards,
