On 03/09/17 21:07, Luis Speciale wrote:
Le 03/09/2017 à 10:28, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
Assuming disk naming is the same on Mac compared to Debian, you've
written the
iso image in the first partition (/dev/disk1) instead of writing it to
the
device (/dev/disk).
I don't know if both name the volumes the same way. Looking at this with
a command that lists the volumes, I have this
➜ ~ diskutil list
/dev/disk0 (internal, physical):
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUID_partition_scheme *1.0 TB disk0
1: EFI EFI 209.7 MB disk0s1
2: Apple_HFS 999 999.3 GB disk0s2
3: Apple_Boot Recovery HD 650.0 MB disk0s3
/dev/disk1 (external, physical):
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: Apple_partition_scheme *16.0 GB disk1
1: Apple_partition_map 4.1 KB disk1s1
2: Apple_HFS 426.0 KB disk1s2
That is interesting. macOS is derived from BSD via NeXT and here I
suspect shows a BSD-like naming convention. The "s" stands for slice.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand
