On Thursday 17 November 2016 12:12:57 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:39:18PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 November 2016 15:18:14 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > Your answer highlights the problem, although it's not quite what you > > > said: the pay-off is, better docs! Which are very important. > > > > I said no **obvious** pay-off. That is not the same as no payoff. > > Yes, but the implied importance of documentation in your reply was the key > thing; you don't regard it as that important, which is common.
That is quite simply untrue and totally unwarranted. I explained the problem. I did NOT say that I regarded documentation as unimportant, nor did I imply that documentation was unimportant. Lisi
