Hi Dutch,
Actually I got that information from a Google staffer working with
accessibility. Such was why, at the time, gmail stopped working with
links.
they have changed that factor though, and links often produces more
detailed search results than lynx.
I appreciate your providing this correction.
Still, that brings up two questions of my own regarding links.
first, does the browser still not accept cookies?
and second, what is the comparative solution to Hans' forbidden site
problem?
I do not know if I can alter the send user agent command in links.
I would welcome an idea though, because there are times when using links
is the wiser option, but that barrier presents a problem.
Thanks,
Karen
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:47:14AM -0400, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Links is no longer updated,
Where did you get this information? As far as I can see, links was updated on
July 1, 2016.[1][2] Does that qualify as "no longer updated"?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_(web_browser)
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/links/
