Hi, Michael Fothergill wrote: > $ file xaralx > xaralx: ELF 32-bit ... dynamically linked ... for GNU/Linux 2.2.5,
That's really old. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Timeline > $ ldd xaralx > not a dynamic executable Probably just too old dynamics to be recognizable nowadays. The command sytax for ldd is ok. A freshly compiled binary of mine nicely reports its dynamic libraries when inquired that way. (hopping back in thread) > /home/mikef/Documents/xaralx/bin/xaralx (No such file or directory) This did not happen to me since about 1999. Iirc the error message shall tell that the binary cannot find one or more of its dynamic libraries. Back then it was an indication that the binary needed to be freshly compiled from source. Greg Wooledge wrote: > https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO I would be glad if my expectation would be disappointed that the 32 bit libraries are much too young for the medieval binary. Have a nice day :) Thomas
