2016-04-15 05:09 keltezéssel, Philippe Clérié írta: > By now, I suspect most IPv4 networks use private addresses, i.e. > 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/16, 192.168.0.0/24. So, it makes sense to have a > VPN between two different networks with such addresses so that they can > communicate. > > With IPv6, every* address is routable over the internet, and there is > no equivalent set of private addresses like the above. Therefore any two > IPv6 networks should be directly accessible to each other, obviating the > need for VPN or NAT for that matter.
VPN is not about private ranges. > > Plus IPv6 is already encrypted. IPv6 has encryption capabilities but not mandatory. -- --- Friczy --- 'Death is not a bug, it's a feature'
