----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arnt Karlsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 00:18
Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS:
"Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]


> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:49:50 -0600,
> "Hoyt Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Alfredo Valles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 14:02
> > Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong --
> > [WAS:"Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
> >
> >
> > > On Saturday 15 November 2003 2:30 pm, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:17:27PM -0500, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 14 November 2003 11:23 pm, Tom wrote:
> > > > > > compared to the taliban and the islamists, I cannot believe
> > > > > > you are acusing *US* of advocating a theocracy.  talk about
> > > > > > head up the ass.
> > > > >
> > > > > But  talibans and islamists don't spend billions of dollars a
> > > > > year in weapons.
> > > >
> > > > No, they just fund terrorist groups that fly planes into occupied
> > > > skyscrapers.
> > >
> > > I don't like talibans. But what I mean is that if you launch all the
> > > planes on US against New York city it won't cause 10% of the
> > > destruction of a single nuclear missile. (I'm sure that  US have
> > > more nuclear missiles than civil plains).
> > >
> >
> > That just simply isnt true.  There may be more than 100,000 civil
> > aeroplanes in the US.  I doubt there is 10% of that number of missels
> > with Nucular tips.
>
> ..those 250 000 planes would need nuclear charges to match those
> 8000 US nukes.  They however easily match a single tactical nuke.
>
> > Whatever the number there are likely enough to destroy any country or
> > series of conturys that start such an exchange.  How many have been
> > fired?=0
>
> ..what stops Sissy Boy George from launching a "preventive" strike to
> prevent an indictment for war crimes and treason under US Law?
>
> -- 
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
>   Scenarios always come in sets of three:
>   best case, worst case, and just in case.
>
Three things:
His God.
His Honor.
His Rep with the american people.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to