On 24/02/16 22:50, Nicolas George wrote: > Le sextidi 6 ventôse, an CCXXIV, Richard Hector a écrit : >> Fair enough. Got a link to someone else's explanation? > > Sorry, I do not. But I gave a rather lengthy explanation myself in > the part you trimmed.
Oh, ok. I assumed from your comment about not wanting to explain that there was more that you weren't explaining. That and I'm a bit short on sleep :-) I'll have another look later. Richard