-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:49:55AM -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
[...] > Most lists discourage posts of the length in question. > > > > > You didn't say how large this "Massive snip" was. > > All it takes is looking at the quoted message. You can do this as easily > as I. OK. I did. It's 16K (headers and all). The sum of your messages in this thread amounts to 7.8K -- just trying to impose your opinion. I think that's enough: your opinion is now clear enough, some others disagree. (I, for one. I've solved many a problem by finding relevant mailing list archive entries -- yes, often older than 1 year. Sometimes by an indexed error message -- which wouldn't have been indexed in pastebin [genuine question: does a pastebin entry have a back-link to the relevant discussion?]. No, I strongly disagree with you). Sure, there must be a limit for included stuff. For me, it's *far* beyond 16K. Somewhere between 100K and 1M perhaps. regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlZqmzMACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbQsACdGjGIKAZTPmeZ11vLHnbcmi/G l+UAn0Cx2vkNH5uS9ZYDfSGoOWxP3njB =+0Ew -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
