On Wednesday 02 December 2015 04:21:04 Stuart Longland wrote: > On 01/12/15 11:56, John Hasler wrote: > > Bob Bernstein writes: > >> With that as background, here is my question/request: is anyone aware > >> of a spirited defence of our ideal method of "selective quoting," (for > >> lack of a better label) one, say, that perhaps has achieved the status > >> of a "net classic?" Surely some 'net genius has dealt these > >> nay-sayers, who seem to LIKE top-posting, a solid uppercut? > > > > Waste of effort. The usual reason for top-posting (or bottom-posting > > without editing) is laziness. > > I often counter that by passing my would-be reply through tac and > top-post it that way. > > Then they see it from my perspective.
That is brilliant!! I can'tr wait to try it on a desreving recipient. Now, has anyone got an equivalent to impose on People who WILL send HTML? Lisi
