on your question of ' which pkm' i only can answer (again) go: do your research: so this circle closed itself too.
start p.e. with apt how-to by gustavo noronha silva: very useful.
and, for me, apt is good enough. especially the time after wilmer van der gaast advised me to 'leave' caldera and step up to debian about a year ago.
debian is far from perfect of course but i am still delighted about the strict logical mathematical build-up.
so my advice to you: do something about yourself and discover again how positive it is to do honest work and find then the solution to a problem yourself.
steef
>>>Kernel updates go in pretty quickly, as a rule. wireless-tools is up to >>>> > > date in testing, and linux-wlan-ng is only a fraction behind unstable. >> >>> > >>> > Why isn't it showing me these? > >> >> Kernel package names change, therefore package management tools don't >> upgrade them automatically, which is probably a good thing for kernels. >> Use a real package manager (not apt-get) which shows you new packages.
The really funny thing about this whole topic is that we've now come full circle. Read the subject line.
I am asking what package manager I should use, because apt-get doesn't seem to handle it well. You are telling me to use a different package manager. I had that answer before I started this thread.
Which one?
-- Joe Rhett Chief Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
