On Sunday 23 August 2015 06:51:45 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 23 August 2015 02:24:13 Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 22 August 2015 20:15:33 you wrote: > > > Gene Heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> writes: > > > > On Saturday 22 August 2015 11:46:37 you wrote: > > > >> Gene Heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> writes: > > [snip] > > Gene - the thread is broken and you have done done this weird quoting. > Please, who is "you"????? I was trying to look back. Impossible. So > I gave up trying to understand. > > Quoting without attribution is becoming more common. Please, folk, > attribution is both polite, to the author, and helpful, to the reader. > > Lisi > P.S. I went on to Gmail and had a look. It appears that a mail from > Carl has "disappeared", which is what broke the thread. And in this > case, since I haven't got the mail from Carl, attribution wouldn't > have helped me identify it.
He had mistakenly sent it as a PM, and I put it back on the list so it would get more eyeballs. And perhaps usable responses too. :) Sorry about the confusion Lisi. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
