On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:01:15 +1200 Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
Hello Chris, >Then you *would* be asking for trouble. IMHO, if anti static measures >are not observed, then it doesn't mean the computer will not function >but more likely a weakness to the chips occurs and then a failure >further on down the track. I'm aware of the problems and pitfalls; I've over thirty years experience in the electronics industry. >Of course nobody would be messing round in the computer without an anti >static wrist strap on, would they? Of course they do. Most people don't care about such things. Talk to the average Joe about taking ant-static precautions and they look at you as though you're speaking <insert suitable foreign language here>. >That is what I'm referring to, apparently compressed air is recommended >instead. The only time I've had any problem may have been as a result of blowing dirt into the PSU whilst compressed air cleaning - the power supply died within minutes of being powered back on after cleaning. It may have been a coincidence of course, but there had not been any indications of power instability before the clean. ><wonders if Brad's computers last as long as they should.> Current machine has lasted well over 5 years and shows no signs of problems. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" Stained glass windows keep the cold outside Religion - Public Image Ltd
pgpak1qeNed75.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature