Last I heard, debian was not participating in any of the initiatives to get officially microsoft-signed signatures for kernels. I've been out of the community for a few months, so I haven't kept up with this, but quick searches don't reveal a change in policy.
(And I am definitely not arguing for a change in policy, for anyone who might misread me.) I have a netbook that allows secure boot to be disabled. As long as I don't need to boot MSWindows, I just disable secure boot. (I don't perceive any real advantage in Microsoft's implementation, anyway.) But I have some work coming up that requires dual-booting MSWindows, and I also might want to use debian (rather than Ubuntu or Fedora) as a host for developing for Android. (I am able to boot openbsd from an outboard USB3 drive and keep it running long enough to build a snapshot release. That's roughly a day, plus or minus a few hours. So I have one good option. But I'd really prefer not to spend too much time running the OS itself from an outboard device whose connection can slip or get noisy from oxidation so easily.) So, I'd like to ask those who for whatever reason dual-boot debian with MSWindows on a modern MSW8/10 compliant box, what do you do about keys? And I'm also interested in war stories relative to (dual) booting from GPT partitions. -- Joel Rees Be careful when you look at conspiracy. Arm yourself with knowledge of yourself, as well: http://reiisi.blogspot.jp/2011/10/conspiracy-theories.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caar43imy0zxthdq+oktlbku63bgks6iesuci+eo3ottutem...@mail.gmail.com
