On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:51 AM, rajiv chavan <rc214...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/23/15, to...@tuxteam.de <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:24:52PM +0530, rajiv chavan wrote: >>> Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:16:51 +0530 >>> >>> Is calculation memory/cpu cycle intensive? >>> Consider a faster (and multi-core) processor with more cache? >> >> Agreed -- but I think you wanted to reply to list or to the original >> poster, Dan. >> >> regards >> - -- t >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlWJjlEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZHxQCfaeDakuB+6QOlYLS8nkQ9DNae >> q84An3xu7OoKkfTSrpdyRL+Nbj8ApCyI >> =/S4F >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > Thank you Tomas.
Hi, Yes the calculation is memory/cpu instensive. I can not consider a faster (multi-core) processor because I do not have the budget to buy a new machine. But I need more RAM, the calculation do not fit in 64 GB of RAM. Probably I will increase the RAM, I will also compare the calculation time. I will post the results in the list. Thanks, Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAK00fO+VNBAfeJ_08CQ0uB3ZG+y_O=k6px0rayjomu5znkn...@mail.gmail.com
