On Tuesday 19 May 2015 14:13:45 张启德(Zhang Qide) wrote: > 2015-05-19 16:42 GMT+08:00 Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com>: > > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:09:25 张启德(Zhang Qide) wrote: > >> It's not recommend to use scim, thoungh it's still work. > > > > This is interesting. I'd be interested in why. Once scim is going, it > > seems to work well in Japanese - but that doesn't, of course, mean that > > it does in Chinese. For a start, there is the big difference that > > Chinese has ideograms only. > > The main reason is scim for Chinese is almost unmaintained. I don't > have enough knowledge about Korean and Japanese status in scim. > Nowdays, almost all major distributions have switched to ibus, it > supports more input method and works better than scim under GNOME/KDE. > > There are some better discussions， > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Input_Bus > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/IBus > https://blogs.gnome.org/happyaron/2011/01/15/linux-input-method-brief-summa >ry/ > > Fcitx and uim is just another good choice for Chinese and Japanese.
Thank you. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201505191505.13711.lisi.re...@gmail.com
