On 2015-04-24 16:39:51 -0500, David Wright wrote: > Well that's a relief. I was getting worried about there being some > "magic" involved when you said you didn't use cacheing. So, looking > back at https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/04/msg01265.html , > > "In which case, if you want to know how come mutt is so fast, take a > look at the source. Just to mention one optimisation I would consider: > slurp the directory and sort the entries by inode. Open the files in > inode order.
When you said that, I didn't know that this was taken from Mutt (or perhaps you suggested that without looking at the Mutt source?). This is now done in my script, but I had to use the ReadDir module from CPAN, since both readdir implementations in Perl (the standard readdir Perl function and POSIX::readdir) just return the file name. And this ReadDir module isn't available in a Debian package. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150425004617.ga12...@xvii.vinc17.org
