To wind this down a bit.... (massive snippage)
> > > > Thin Clients might be suitable for copy typists, data entry clerks > > > > and Dumb Users. Certainly not for engineers or anybody who's > > > > likely to be reading this list. If we thought Microcrap was the > > > > greatest we wouldn't be on this list, right? > > > > > > Guess what? Thin-clients work *great* on Linux! http://www.ltsp.org > > > > > > TC obviously isn't suitable for your tasks, but to say "Does anyone > > > wonder why I hate Thin Clients...?" is a very "big" sentence. > > > > *I* hate Thin Clients, for the very good reasons I stated. I never said > > everybody else has to, I guess there are zillions of Windoze users out > > there who are perfectly happy locked in a cosy padded cell. > > Again, it's MS, not TC. OK, let's just say that I *hate* Thin Clients when they're loaded with nothing but Micro$oft software. I have no experience of Thin Clients running Linux so I'd better reserve judgement on those. :) cr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]