Michael I. <linux-michae...@abwesend.de> wrote: > Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: >> Michael I. <linux-michae...@abwesend.de> wrote:
>>> But I have a new problem, I want to have a transparent proxy for >>> http this works fine but when I add the iptables rule for https the >>> loading won't work. >> >> Of course not. That this is not working is the _whole point_ of any >> end-to-end encrypted connection. >> >> What you are effectivly trying to do is an Man-in-the-Middle >> "attack". > All I want is to protect children of harmful content (adult content). You have already lost. If you build walls around content you don't like, your children _will_ find ways of accessing it some other way. Besides, all younger children (younger than 12/14 years) I observed surfing the web don't have any direct interest in "nudity" anyway. And if they stumble upon such an image the reaction was "eww, gross" and a quick click on the "Back"-button. And older children, after starting puberty, already had several access methods for "recreational pictures", mostly through friends. There is no way of protecting your children by technical means without going down a rabbit hole of problems and inconveniences. Educate them, supervise them. There is no other way. By building a "STOP sign" in front of things you only heighten the curiosity. If your children are too young, they shouldn't use the Internet without a parent (or other trusted person) present anyway. If they are old enough, you have to learn to trust them and exersice other disciplinary consequences if they do things they should not do. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/12bg3m53ro...@mids.svenhartge.de
