On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:47:55 +0100 Jochen Spieker <m...@well-adjusted.de> wrote:
> Florent Peterschmitt: > > > > But, in both cases (with or without instructions), you will not really > > notice any difference even with a quite old processor, like core i2. You > > may find it a little slower at machine's first boot. If we speak about > > Desktop computers. Never tried to setup encryption on loaded servers. > > Just a data point: my small file server at home is based on an Atom D510 > (dual core, 2.66GHz) without any hardware acceleration for AES. It > manages to do about 30 MByte/s throughput from LUKS-on-LVM-on-DM-RAID > over NFS. Any decent laptop/desktop CPU from the past five years can > probably saturate USB2, GBit ethernet and possibly even USB3 with this > configuration. Thanks. I know I can probably saturate my old USB2 bus, but I was wondering if there would be any noticeable increase in CPU utilization while doing so - this is a work system, and I'll be using it while accessing the encrypted FS. > My wife even worked with eCryptFS for $HOME on her Atom-based netbook > for several years. The system wasn't noticeably slower than it was from > the start. Good to know, thanks. Celejar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150204135422.cea12f9190da940930eeb...@gmail.com
