On Lu, 08 dec 14, 06:59:13, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:12:55 +0100 > Christian Groessler <ch...@groessler.org> wrote: > > > Why don't the systemd proponents understand that someone might want to > > interrupt a running fsck? Don't scrutinize the reasons, just accept the > > fact. > > After all, it's *my* computer, and *I* want to be in control of it. > > Because their mind-set is "We are Systemd of Borg, resistance is futile..." ? > (Or to go back further to the Immortal Bard's Hamlet: "The insolence of > office") > > But remember, while it is their ball, nothing can force us to continue > playing with them once they impose their choice. > > Just now I am giving Slackware a good look-over...
Reading two related bugs[1][2] on this issue it rather seems to me like nobody has bothered to implement this, although it's on the TODO list[3]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719952 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799574 [3] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/TODO Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
