Am 01.11.2014 22:17, schrieb Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > Christian Seiler: >> Finally: Upstart also supports socket activation. It's not quite as > > powerful as systemd's, but is has enough features for this use case. > > I don't know the people developing util-linux, but I could imagine > > them accepting a patch to also support Upstart-style socket > > activation, if one were to write such a patch. > > > > Or, if you want to: a while back I wrote some code to translate init > > system related stuff between one another. [...] > > .. but in doing so you made the oft-made mistake of thinking that there > are only two service management systems.
Well, not exactly. It's just that those were the top two contenders in Debian's TC decision, so I thought them to be most important for the purposes of my small program, so I initially started with that. On my hard drive I have some incomplete code lying around that changes the code I pushed to github dramatically to abstract this kind of stuff (socket activation, notification) a bit more (being more generic w.r.t. different init systems), but as I said, I lost interest in that because I got next to no feedback on this. Otherwise, thanks for the very useful explanations about nosh & companions, I'll have a closer look at them once I find some time for that. But with regard to the topic at hand, if I understand your explanation correctly, something akin to my code is actually not necessary with nosh, right? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54555400.2040...@iwakd.de
