On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:32:31AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Ludovic Meyer wrote: > >>Even with the addition 10 to 20 people posting on systemd, > >>it shouldn't be a issue. > >Andrei's point was not that the list /infrastructure/ was at risk, but > >that debian-user - this list - was essentially subject to a denial of > >service, because it's main purpose - user support - was impeded by the > >amount of systemd/-vote watching posts taking place. > > > > Particularly all those posts by folks saying "don't talk about systemd" - > seems to me there's about a 3-1 multiplier effect. Complain about systemd > (or even ask about a problem with it) and 3-5 people immediately weigh in to > simply say "shut up." Talk about DoS.
Can you cite a post where this actually happened? Posts about problems (i.e. bugs) are welcomed. Possibly it got messed up in a thread taken over by the anti-systemd vigilantes? -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141023110911.GD29294@tal
