Who needs to document their own pc they hack on daily? suddenly I couldnt just place a script in rc2.d folder anymore, needed to symlink needed to add an lsb header too it seems
maybe I'm overlooking something I prefer to hack on my own without using debian tools, update-rc.d i.e. would be nice to be able to place a script in rc2.d folder again, even though it isn't a symlink it seems that 'feature' has been removed in the new debians I wouldn't do it at work/anywhere where documentation is important though but why force people to document / use the right tools? I prefer an OS that is easy to hack around debian init scripts is something that frustrates me often, because I can't just hack them easily need to symlink in different folders or use the debian tool got no experience with sysV or whatever it uses, only bash programming which I am fairly good with so it frustrates me that hacking initscripts should be so annoying at times :P it used to work good back in the days, I could just add an S99mio and that would get executed after booting not anymore, now it needs to be symlinked and all it seems there used to be an /etc file one could edit to make boot scripts anyone remember which one? rc.local or such I think, but not sure anymore, debian has changed a bit lately it seems How do you hack a quick init script these days?:) > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > > Hey Paul, > > > > I really appreciate your feedback. Glad to see that at least, systemd in > > Debian have some boundaries. Whew! Tks! > > > > I'll try to disable html messages for all Debian Lists at my GMail account > > right now, sorry about that. > > > > Nevertheless, I'm not flaming (not my intention, really), I care about > > Debian. ;-) > > > > Cheers! > > Thiago > > > > ** We don't need "kdbus @ PID 1". It did not got merged into Linux 3.15... > > Think about it.* > > ** uselessd might replace systemd, since it have all that CGroups cool > > stuff, without systemd's useless bits. We just need a new udev! :-P* > > > > On 21 October 2014 02:21, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Please do not use HTML mail on Debian lists. > > > > > > Please do not flame on Debian lists. > > > > > > https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct > > > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > > > > > > tried it without success, lots of bugs popped everywhere when with > > > systemd), > > > > > > Please file bugs about issues you find in Debian packages: > > > > > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting > > > > > > > > > > http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html > > > ... > > > > So, is systemd even trying to replace dpkg+apt too? > > > > > > No. > > > > > > -- > > > bye, > > > pabs > > > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141021064119.ga31...@rlogin.dk
