1- Fork udev (out from systemd's tree or before it got merged / engulfed); 2- Start testing uselessd; 3- Remove systemd from Debian sources, since it is uselessd now lol ;
I vote for upstart too (instead of uselessd), since I'm using without any problems (and it is not trying to take over the world). I believe (because I'm not a software engineer), that the main problem with systemd started when they merged udev. That was a smart move (for Them) but, there is time to take udev back and use another init, as good old days. Jut my two bitcents... On 20 October 2014 17:45, Patrick Bartek <nemomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to systemd, > I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't be sysvinit. > > Yes. Syvinit still works, but it is after all 20 years old. It's been > patched and bolted onto and jury-rigged to get it to do things that > weren't even around (or dreamt of) at its inception. It's long past > due for a contemporary replacement. Whatever that may be. > > So, what would you all propose? For a server? Or for a user desktop? > Or something that fulfills both scenarios? And why? > > Just wondering. > > > B > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/20141020124511.44a19...@debian7.boseck208.net > >
