On 18/10/14 23:28, Peter Nieman wrote: > On 17/10/14 20:25, Brian wrote: >> Why >> it needs to be compiled without dbus is also unknown. > > You're asking the wrong question. The question you should ask yourself > is: if claws-mail works perfectly well without dbus, then why does > Debian ship a version that depends on it? > > Do you have an answer to your question?
Wild guess - notifications? Now my question - why did you remove Brian's question from it's context? TIA NOTE: He was responding to the, um, claim that removing dbus in some unknown way removed a (possible??) systemd *dependency*. I'm all for removing the unnecessary - especially if it's code. Generally if it's considered a failing the usual course is to file a bug report but I can't seem to find one. All guidance is appreciated. Kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/544253b6.2010...@gmail.com
