On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 10:47:13 -0500, goli...@riseup.net wrote: > On Tue, 10/14/14, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > Subject: Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?) > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2014, 1:56 AM > > You are still writing as if you are going to be forced to run > systemd, despite > being repeatedly told that multiple init systems will be supported. > I'm really > struggling to continue to presume "good faith" on your part now. > > -------------------------------------------- > > It's about so much more than the choice of init systems. It's that > systemd shoots it's tentacles into DEs and applications. That's the > real problem. What's the point of having a non-systemd init system > if nothing will work on it? Those 'entanglements' are the real > lock-down.
On Debian we talk about dependencies. It would make things much more understandable for everyone if you stuck with the same terminology. Please return when you have something to say which hasn't been said before and which relates in some sensible way to the technical point made in the mail you have replied to. We pinned down the real problem a few months ago. He is still posting. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/14102014181315.1de6e75d7...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
