On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 06:34:17 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > On 14/10/2014 5:56 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> On Lu, 13 oct 14, 12:34:27, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>> Again.. when did the desktop become the priority for Debian. For years, > >>> Debian (and Linux in general) has been most useful in the server > >>> environment. Breaking server deployments, at the expense of the desktop > >>> seems like bad policy. > >> Do you have any evidence of systemd breaking your setup? If yes, would > >> you please be so kind to at least file corresponding bugs? > > > > Hell no. I have no time at all for testing at the moment - I've got > > production systems to maintain, and security holes to patch (I haven't > > even begun to think how many new security holes sytsemd is going to > > introduce). > > A great big +1 from me too. > > Exactly. > > Although I'm up with patching, but I most definitely don't want any > system that I am responsible to maintain to have systemd installed, it > is far too much risk and the changes are not warranted.
Are you incapable of reading what is on debian-user, even threads you have participated in in the past few days? Not having systemd as PID 1 is so easy it's unbelievable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/13102014230316.399d5fd6d...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
