On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 03:42:26PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:59:24AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Which does kind of lead back to the question of what's the point of > > a social contract that says users and their needs are the priority. > > The point is that the people involved in the processes we do have: the > developers, the technical committee; should be considering users first and > foremost with their actions. I have no reason to doubt that the tech-ctte > did exactly that.
If that's true, why the avalanche of dissent now? -- Bob Holtzman Giant intergalactic brain-sucking hyperbacteria came to Earth to rape our women and create a race of mindless zombies. Look! It's working!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
