On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:03:18 +0100 Martin Read <zen75...@zen.co.uk> wrote:
> On 11/10/14 19:00, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > This is the question I have, what are the stated boundaries of the > > systemd project? Have any boundaries/goals been stated in terms of > > when systemd will be feature complete? What is the stated > > compliance to POSIX (Google doesn't seem to provide me good > > results)? > > In respect of the first two questions: I am not aware of any such > firm statements having been made. > > In respect of your third question: Contrary to the implicit > expectation that seems to be attached to this question, POSIX.1-2008 > appears to have very little to say about how any of the things > systemd does are supposed to work. I think the source of most POSIX questions re systemd is the fact that Poettering has publically stated POSIX should be ignored under certain circumstances, and I mean a lot more circumstances than any Linux implementation currently ignores it. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141011173951.50c60...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
