On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:37:19AM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:15:31AM -0800, Tom wrote: > > I filed a wishlist bug against "links" asking for it to support > > about:blank (highly useful in frames pages as a default for the "body" > > frame). > > > > Maintainer closed it as a nonstandard feature, but asked me I could > > point to a standard. Do you know of any significant graphical browsers > > that don't support "about:blank" by returning a blank page? I know they > > all handle other "about:xxx" commands differently. > > He asked you to come up with a standard, so why aren't you looking > for that? Might be nice to come up with a list of "browsers that do" > and "browsers that don't", but you're still going to need to point to > an RFC to have a convincing argument. Good on the maintainer for > adhering to standards and not giving in to creaping feeturitus.
How come y'all are being adversarial? I agree with the maintainer. I'm just curious what browsers support it :-) Jeez, grandstanding.... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
