On 10/6/2014 10:25 AM, Brian wrote: > On Mon 06 Oct 2014 at 09:06:17 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > >> On 10/6/2014 8:05 AM, Brian wrote: >>> >>> Note that the OP is going to have something like 192.168.2.0/24 for >>> dc_relay_nets. Even if exim was listening on an external interface (an >>> empty dc_local_interfaces) exim is not set up to relay mail due to a >>> connection on this interface. >>> >>> And then we have the bedtime stories to frighten the children: hordes of >>> attempts to relay through a mail server. Like this one: >>> >>> 2014-10-06 07:19:44 H=114-43-21-85.dynamic.hinet.net (80.177.21.246) >>> [114.43.21.85] F=<sdf2...@hotmail.com> rejected RCPT >>> <sanjin...@yahoo.com.tw>: relay not permitted >>> 2014-10-06 07:19:45 unexpected disconnection while reading SMTP command >>> from 114-43-21-85.dynamic.hinet.net (80.177.21.246) [114.43.21.85] >>> >>> There is more chance of the 0's and 1's of my exim binary spontaneously >>> disassociating and reassembling into a copy of postfix than one of these >>> getting through. >> >> And there are people who think that setting up an MTA correctly is easy, >> and then turn around and prove they have no idea what they're talking about. > > You appear to be avoiding agreeing that > > dc_relay_nets='192.168.2.0/24' > > only allows relaying of mail from that (and no other) network. If that > is case you need to address the specific point rather than indulge in > generalities. > >
I hate to repeat myself, but - there are people who think that setting up an MTA is easy, then turn around and prove they have no idea what they are talking about... Jerry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5432ae33.2020...@attglobal.net
