[for the archives] On Sb, 23 aug 14, 13:43:50, Mark Carroll wrote: > > In my /etc/apt/preferences.d/preferences I have, > > Package: * > Pin: release a=stable > Pin-Priority: 600
You are increasing priority of stable, from 500 to 600, why? > and also, > > Package: * > Pin: release a=testing > Pin-Priority: 50 > > Package: * > Pin: release a=unstable > Pin-Priority: 40 This will make both testing and unstable have a lower priority than installed packages. In practice this means you will *never* receive updates to packages you installed from testing or unstable. Not even security updates. If all one wants to do is install packages from testing on an otherwise stable system it's much simpler to use Default-Release in apt.conf: // this sets 'stable' to priority 990 APT::Default-Release "stable"; If unstable has to be used (are you sure? packages should migrate to testing within days anyway) then yes, it makes sense to pin it to something lower than 100. Beware though that the package will not be updated until testing has a higher version. This is especially important in case of security upgrades. And don't forget, 'apt-cache policy' (with or without <package>) is your best friend when pinning. Also, as a general remark, it's much better to use code-names everywhere, to avoid surprises whenever there is a release. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
