On Thursday, October 2, 2014 5:40:02 AM UTC+5:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 01 oct 14, 19:44:06, Slavko wrote: > > And all these things are named as "systemd alternative" in Debian now > > and as argument that the systemd is not only one possible PID 1.
> Your comments from this and other posts seem to suggest there is a big > conspiracy in Debian trying to make everybody believe there is choice of > init systems while there is not. Assuming you are not simply trolling > I'd like to point out: As the OP, I'd like to point out a less conspiratorial possibility: the quality of documentation. On trying to upgrade I see a problem with systemd-shim.¹ Looking up the documentation of the package, I see: ------------- Description: shim for systemd This package emulates the systemd function that are required to run the systemd helpers without using the init service -------------- To me, a non-expert user, what sense does this make? Is 2 lines normal documentation for an apt package? ---------------- ¹ Also with some povray stuff, but by now I know just enough to know that if povray breaks, povray breaks, if systemd breaks, I'll probably have an unbootable system: Well thats the hearsay, Ive not seen directly an unbootable system Ive seen so far - networking getting knocked off - gdm getting knocked off - other random glitches like erratic shutdowns -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/d9884c9d-c522-4039-82ca-a3d60c376...@googlegroups.com
